| 1 |
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:19 PM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I have thunderbird-10.0.11, and it works OK. |
| 5 |
> It has simple things missing, like the ability |
| 6 |
> to set what app to handle .ppt files.... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Anyone tryied thunderbird (~17.0) ? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I use it every day, it works for me. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> commnet? I used testing packages but, not |
| 14 |
> much tolerance for hacking at the mail reader |
| 15 |
> I'm dependant upon..... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Honestly it doesn't change much. Mostly bugfixes and performance |
| 18 |
improvements. There's not a lot of new innovations in email. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The main changes since v10 are a new UI, mimicking the new Firefox UI. |
| 21 |
Otherwise there haven't been any real killer features IMO. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> But, I'm curious if thunderbird 17 is worth setting |
| 24 |
> up on another box with dummy mail account to test? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
v10 ESR has been replaced by v17 ESR so I see no reason not to upgrade |
| 27 |
to v17. There should be no danger in upgrading in-place over your |
| 28 |
existing data, but I always make a backup before a major version |
| 29 |
upgrade just in case. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
It's your decision. :) |
Archives