| 1 |
I intended to stay silent, however I feel obliged to balance the posts |
| 2 |
from brullonulla@×××××.com |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 22 Dec 2008, at 02:46, Willie Wong wrote: |
| 6 |
> ... |
| 7 |
> You are still under one assumption: that if you had sent your e-mail |
| 8 |
> in plain text, you won't be ignored. Granted that you will be ignored |
| 9 |
> less if you send e-mail in plain text compared to HTML, it is not |
| 10 |
> always the case. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> ... I've seen your original post. I've see your repost. And |
| 13 |
> I've seen your query about why you are getting ignored. For me, the |
| 14 |
> answer is simple: I have no freaking clue how to solve your problem. |
| 15 |
> And I suspect the same goes for a lot of people on this list. Many |
| 16 |
> (dare I say most) people on this list don't care for HTML e-mails; |
| 17 |
> many people on this list use a mail client or a mailcap that is |
| 18 |
> capable of dealing HTML e-mails. |
| 19 |
> ... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> So don't be such a pompous ass. We didn't ignore you because we don't |
| 22 |
> like you. ... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> So you are pissed that you got ignored. Well, tough. Stop making it |
| 25 |
> sound like hordes of people have came before you and were ignored |
| 26 |
> because of their HTML e-mails, and that unless this reform passes |
| 27 |
> hordes more of people will suffer the same fate. It just ain't true. |
| 28 |
> While I agree that it may be a good idea to have an FAQ somewhere |
| 29 |
> for the mailing lists discussion basic netiquette, your rather |
| 30 |
> personal vendetta is blowing this way out of proportion. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+1 |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I agree wholeheartedly. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Stroller. |
Archives