Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Google privacy changes
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:16:32
Message-Id: CAEH5T2MYh0ui6QfzeQV4GrRhZ1P8FLW8CxUbDKYDGLwTaZO26Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Google privacy changes by v_2e@ukr.net
1 On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:48 AM, <v_2e@×××.net> wrote:
2 >  Hello!
3 >
4 > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:16:01 -0600
5 > Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
6 >
7 >> Does anyone have a better search tool?  I don't like Yahoo either.  I
8 >> do like froogle so that would be a bonus.  You know, shopping tool.
9 >>
10 >> Thoughts?  Suggestions?
11 >>
12 >  What about Yandex? It provides a search tool and a mail box with POP3
13 > and IMAP protocols support free of charge. And by the way, they say
14 > that the mailbox size is also indefinite (well, at least
15 > theoretically :) ).
16
17 I'll add a vote of support for Yandex. It usually has good results,
18 though it really depends on what you are searching for. I did some
19 test queries asking random linux questions and the link containing the
20 solution was usually higher in the list on Yandex when compared to
21 Google. Comparing local shopping prices in the US, use Google
22 instead...
23
24 Based on my web server logs, the bots which check the most often are:
25
26 1. Baidu
27 2. MJ12
28 3. Gootkit auto-rooter
29 4. Bing
30 5. Yandex
31 6. Yobao
32 7. Google
33 8. ZmEu
34
35 3 and 8 are bots trying exploits, 2 is not a search engine, 1 and 6
36 are not available in English, 4 is Microsoft, and 7 is excluded for
37 the present conversation. So, Yandex seems a good choice. In fact, the
38 only remaining choice. :)
39
40 BTW, the Baidu spider hits my site more than all of the others combined...

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Google privacy changes Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>