1 |
Paul Varner schreef: |
2 |
>> What is going wrong here? It can't be my implementation of rsync |
3 |
>> (latest stable), or the US pool would fail as well. It could be the |
4 |
>> servers in the European pool, but... all of them? |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Or am I simply using the wrong SYNC= in /etc/make.conf? My default |
7 |
>> is rsync.europe.gentoo.org, and I don't see any documentation that |
8 |
>> indicates that that has changed or become deprecated or invalid, |
9 |
>> but maybe it has. I don't particularly want to switch permanently |
10 |
>> to the US pool, as that just seems to make more vectors of |
11 |
>> instability for everybody, and is not really the point of having |
12 |
>> continental mirror pools anyway. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Anybody got a clue as to what's happening and what, if anything, I |
15 |
>> can do to fix it? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> You didn't state which version of rsync, but the versions below 2.6.4 |
19 |
> do have timeout issues. See the following bugs: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83254 |
22 |
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783 |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
Thanks for the tip, Paul-- that could definitely be the issue: |
26 |
|
27 |
net-misc/rsync |
28 |
Available versions: 2.6.0-r5 2.6.0-r6 ~2.6.3-r1 ~2.6.4 ~2.6.5 ~2.6.6 |
29 |
Installed: 2.6.0-r6 |
30 |
|
31 |
For the time being, I've changed my sync mirror pool to the national one |
32 |
(rather than the continental one), which seems like it's OK (but it's |
33 |
early days yet, and I haven't tested extensively). |
34 |
|
35 |
Is it worth going unstable with rsync for this? meaning, will using an |
36 |
unstable rsync cause me any "real" problems, even as it (hopefully) |
37 |
solves this (relatively minor) annoyance? |
38 |
|
39 |
Thanks for the links; I'll look at the bugs later. |
40 |
|
41 |
Holly |
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |