Re: [gentoo-user] Broken GCC

[Michael Mol]

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Samuraiii <samurai.no.dojo@×××××.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2012-09-07 18:09, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Samuraiii <samurai.no.dojo@×××××.com>
> wrote:
>
> On 2012-09-07 17:44, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Samuraiii <samurai.no.dojo@×××××.com>
> wrote:
>
> On 2012-09-07 13:04, William Kenworthy wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:46 +0200, Samuraiii wrote:
>
> On 2012-09-07 11:49, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrey Moshbear <andrey.vul@×××××.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Samuraiii <samurai.no.dojo@×××××.com> wrote:
>
> Hello
> yesterday I probably broke my GCC
>
> Problem is following:
> When i try to emerge ANY package it fails with this :
>
> checking whether the C compiler works... yes
> checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
> checking for suffix of executables...
> checking whether we are cross compiling... configure: error: in
> `/tmp/portage/www-client/links-2.6/work/links-2.6':
> configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs.
> If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'.
> See `config.log' for more details
>
> Can you post the contents of config.log to a pastebin and link to it in a
> reply?
>
> Specifically,  .../portage/www-client/links-2.6/work/links-2.6/config.log
>
> Here it is http://pastebin.com/s59mU9fm
>
> --
> Samuraiii
> e-mail: samurai.no.dojo@×××××.com
> GnuPG key ID: 0x80C752EA (obtainable on http://pgp.mit.edu)
> Full copy of public timestamp block signatures id-15719 (from
> 2012-09-07 06:00:07) is included in header of html.
>
> conftest.c:11:19: fatal error: /usr/local/include/stdio.h: Permission
> denied
>
>
> BillK
>
>
>
>
> What next?
> ls -l /usr/local/include/stdio.h
> ls: cannot access /usr/local/include/stdio.h: No such file or directory
>
> Any idea why you'd have anything under /usr/local? On Gentoo, that's
> usually unnecessary. (Or always unnecessary, if you care to make a
> personal overlay to have your personal packages integrated
> properly...not that hard, actually)
>
>
> That wasn't intentionally made...
>
> Intentional or not, do you have any idea how it might have gotten
> there? Or what you did that might have caused things to look there?
>
> If we knew more, we could tell you more about how to fix it, and even
> how better to do what you had been trying to do.
>
>
> I must admit that this is my lame fault:
>
> I had some issues with pidgin-otr/libotr so I stupidly thought that I can
> get me latest version myslef.
> *But* when I run configure; make; make install it wasn't working as expected
> so I just stupidly tried to issue make uninstall and that probably made this
> problem....

Yeah, it was probably the 'make uninstall' that revealed the issue.
The 'make install' didn't help. :)


>
> I feel so embarrased
> S

Bah. Pretty sure everyone expected something like this.


(But would you mind not using whitespace to quote previous
conversations? It looks like crap when it gets collapsed to
plaintext.)

-- 
:wq