| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Tanstaafl: |
| 5 |
> On 2014-02-21 10:28 AM, Gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:03:47 -0500 Tanstaafl |
| 7 |
>> <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>>> On 2014-02-21 8:54 AM, Daniel Campbell <lists@××××××××.us> |
| 10 |
>>> wrote: |
| 11 |
>>>> If you think all profit is the same, then we are talking on |
| 12 |
>>>> two different wavelengths. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> I didn't say that. I said that *everyone* operates under the |
| 15 |
>>> profit motive. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> And that is simply not true. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Yes, it is, but you may be confused about the meaning of 'profit'. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Even someone who volunteers in the local soup kitchen feeding the |
| 22 |
> homeless is doing so under the profit motive. The things is, the |
| 23 |
> 'profit' involved (may) only involve(s) a 'warm fuzzy good |
| 24 |
> feeling'. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> If you read my previous words, I said it wasn't always (though I |
| 27 |
> think it is usually) some kind of 'financial' profit. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
You didn't say it, but it feels like you are talking about "personal |
| 31 |
profit". If not, then your definition of "profit" is so broad, that it |
| 32 |
is almost meaningless. |
| 33 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTB32KAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzvssIALcVgrXn/XGTx5ZmXJjuUpIq |
| 36 |
eN6m6pBQ8b8oO5ujZpx9/l2rMt5zNzwaLpHhF5UEZiZXEEqt9+NSOP62vEuGHn2y |
| 37 |
Xk5JUDNngIuQaz4geKJXs9YcyA2ZV1MFhZYaxDBOq4DZ4+j75e0FiHuh3jGHfr1+ |
| 38 |
qUkZWxyWAxoIGb3CUWTedgpr6HqzMJWycL8BDutItfp7dpCobGoY2DSRKX3iSH73 |
| 39 |
1jtfOx+Ec2QScAmy+fi7sVN9yp5sSSlM4YVmzS5nSw2zemsYVmfqhrTNdPAcy2QE |
| 40 |
k1xlalMzoIY2EGi68ThjRniXrAQoH2R7kfQsavFSVfratbjjuvdDHxa4sNnbjAE= |
| 41 |
=V8cT |
| 42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives