From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64 | ||
Date: | Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:17:15 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130828111655.4eedd2cc@hactar.digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64 by gottlieb@nyu.edu |
1 | On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:27:30 -0400, gottlieb@×××.edu wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands |
4 | > from 2.1.x.y will continue to work? I know that several readers have |
5 | > used 2.2 for years with success. |
6 | |
7 | The commands will, but there may be better alternatives in 2.2. |
8 | |
9 | Man page time :) |
10 | |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Neil Bothwick |
14 | |
15 | "A snooze button is a poor substitute for no alarm clock at all." |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |