1 |
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:51:45 -0800, Grant wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > To talk to this computer from another of my machines over ZT I would |
4 |
> > use the 10.252... address. If you tried that address, you'd get |
5 |
> > nowhere as you are not connected to my network. |
6 |
|
7 |
> So if 10.252.252.6 were configured as a router, could I join your ZT |
8 |
> network and use iptables to route my example.com 80/443 requests to |
9 |
> 10.252.252.6, thereby granting me access to my web apps which are |
10 |
> configured to only allow your machine's WAN IP? |
11 |
|
12 |
You don't need a bridge in a network to join it. If I want you to join |
13 |
it, I give you the network ID and you simply join it, although you can't |
14 |
actually connect to it until I authorise the connection. |
15 |
|
16 |
However, if this machine were configured as a bridge, then once you had |
17 |
joined my network you would have access to all of my LAN, rather like an |
18 |
OpenVPN connection. It seems that the man difference between this and a |
19 |
traditional VPN is that all of the setup work is done on the one |
20 |
computer, connecting extra clients is just a matter of connecting them to |
21 |
the network. |
22 |
|
23 |
Note that I haven't actually tried this, every machine on my LAN that I |
24 |
want to be able to connect to is running ZT so is directly accessible. |
25 |
|
26 |
> Is it possible (easy?) to run your own "core node" and so not interact |
27 |
> with the official core nodes at all? |
28 |
|
29 |
It is definitely possible, and you skip the "only ten clients for |
30 |
free" limit as that only applies to using their servers. Once again, it |
31 |
isn't something I've tried yet, but it is on my list of "things to do |
32 |
when I find some time". I'm quite happy using their discovery servers so |
33 |
this would be only an exercise in trying it "because I can". |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Neil Bothwick |
38 |
|
39 |
MUPHRY'S LAW: The principle that any criticism of the writing of others |
40 |
will itself contain at least one grammatical error. |