Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: Christoph Gysin <cgysin@×××.ch>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question...
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:01:09
Message-Id: d7e1699749600f322ebec8297171c7b2@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question... by Christoph Gysin
1 On Oct 28, 2005, at 10:44 am, Christoph Gysin wrote:
2
3 > Christoph Gysin wrote:
4 >> Nonetheless this seems like a bug and should be fixed. Could you file
5 >> a bug and reference it here?
6 >
7 > Searching google turns out that it has already been fixed. Update to
8 > the latest pciutils will fix the issue.
9
10 Hi,
11
12 Do you have any references on this, please? I'm obviously using
13 different search terms from you, because I can't find anything about
14 this bug on Google.
15
16 I've just run esync & am only offered the same version of pciutils that
17 I already have - 2.1.11-r5. If you can provide a link to the pciutils
18 bug then I'll request a version bump with b.g.o. (I'd also like to know
19 more about this so I can advise my customers, should I request a `lspci
20 -x` output from them).
21
22 Stroller.
23
24 --
25 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question... Christoph Gysin <cgysin@×××.ch>