1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:51:45 +0200, Petar Dimitrijevic wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> I'm not cross compiling. I'm compiling the packages on i686 arch for |
6 |
>> i686 arch. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> The C3 is i586 not i686. Compile for i686 and it will crash. I built a |
10 |
> system booting from CF on an Epia board and I used a variation on this |
11 |
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-244837.html |
12 |
> |
13 |
The CPU on the boards is VIA Mark CoreFusion™ CPU with 533 MHz core. |
14 |
That is a CPU (I think that is VIA C3 Nemiah which is newer than the C3) |
15 |
with integrated southbridge. I've been running i686 Fedora Core on it |
16 |
(By i686 I mean i686 kernel and few applications compiled by hand for |
17 |
i686 arch). |
18 |
|
19 |
I've use to have one or two VIA EPIA boards which could run only i586 |
20 |
software. |
21 |
> Using a compressed filesystem lets you fit far more on the card, I had a |
22 |
> MythTV frontend in less than 256MB. This Wiki page may be worth a look |
23 |
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Small_Footprint_Gentoo_on_USB |
24 |
> |
25 |
> You can reduce the size of packages by adding nodoc, noman and noinfo to |
26 |
> FEATURES. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
I'll definitely give it a look but I had bad experience with compressed |
31 |
file systems in the past. I've tried using Slax or any live cd distro |
32 |
for that matter. There are two variations of the board I'm using. One |
33 |
with 128 MB RAM and one with 256 MB RAM. The second one has no problem |
34 |
whatsoever with running compressed filesystems. But the first one is a |
35 |
living nightmare if you try using compressed filesystem. The CPU is slow |
36 |
and in combination with small amount of RAM it's a real killer. |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |