Re: [gentoo-user] OpenSP build fails

[Nikita Tropin]

gcc-config -l:
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.6.3
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.7.3 *

These are installed: gcc-4.7.3, gcc-4.6.3, clang-3.3. I'm using 4.7.3
and not redefine CC or CXX in make.conf or elsewhere.

I found that getting out `pam' flag from `shadow' flags removes block.
Is it suitable fix(add `-pam' for `shadow' in package.use)? Or ...

As I can understand from
bugtracker(https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412721) I need to:
su # For doing administrative tasks while /etc/pam.d/{su,login,passwd} will gone
emerge shadow
emerge pambase
dispatch-conf && etc-update

PS Thanks Edward, it helps.


2014-04-27 4:44 GMT+03:00 Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>:
>
> On Sat, 26 April 2014, at 10:07 pm, Nikita Tropin <posixivist32@×××××.com> wrote:
>
>> I didn't touch pambase/shadow block for a while, trying to simply `emerge --update @world' and packages that you tell, which doesn't include this pair. …
>
> No, IMO you need to address the pambase/shadow block first.
>
> They're important packages and the transition is important.
>
> There's no point in getting everything else updated, only to find you can't boot the system because of these.
>
> Right now, I would only worry about anything else if it prevented me addressing this matter.
>
>
>> The only thing I'm noticed from above is weechat and conky depends from ncurses but glibc is not and other packages that depends builds fine(zsh, bash, mc).
>
> The glibc error looks to be related to gcc.
>
> What versions of gcc are installed, what does `gcc-config -l` say?
>
> Stroller.
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Nikita