Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

[Daniel da Veiga]

On 6/7/06, Mike Huber <michael.huber@×××××.com> wrote:
> I had some weird problems with the emerge -e system (libraries not
> being properly identified to ./config scripts, that blocking issue
> with pam.d & shadow, usual unstable tree stuff), but after toying with
> it for a few hours, I have a successfully running desktop.
>
> On 6/7/06, Roy Wright <royw@×××××.com> wrote:
> > Mohammed Hagag wrote:
> > > i just want to know if any one here have built a full desktop with
> > > gcc-4.1.1 without problems ?
> > > i have some problems with xf86 video drivers and some other ebuilds.
> > >
> > > i did a bootstartp from normal stage3 and i'm doing emerge -e world
> > > now but some important packages did not compile most of the with
> > > errors about glibc include files.
> > >
> > > any one here know any thing about these problems ??
> > I did: emerge -s && emerge -e && revdep-rebuild
> >
> > You might want to read:
> >
> > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=282474&highlight=
> >
> > which basically recommends:
> >
> >   emerge -s
> >   emerge -s
> >   emerge -e
> >   emerge -e
> >
> > to make sure the toolchain is built correctly.
> >

I'm watching this topic with curiosity, I have switched to ~x86
recently and after it all (and a few debugging) I have all my packages
testing now, but have not switched to the new GCC for fear of things
breaking beyound my knowledge on how to fix it. So, if people start
replying saying things are stable with the new GCC I might switch to
it completely and wait a few days before the "emerge -e system &&
emerge -e world" completes.

Right now I really need my notebook, so, I'm not even thinking about
such a complex and time consuming operation.

-- 
Daniel da Veiga
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-- 
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list