From: | Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | "gentoo-user@l.g.o" <gentoo-user@l.g.o> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox fsck vs. fsck.ext4 ... experiences? | ||
Date: | Sat, 01 Apr 2017 01:08:03 | ||
Message-Id: | CAC=wYCGOL8douypGzFSdR3AukQbjtGDvi2vyXgJO57xGSFcyng@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox fsck vs. fsck.ext4 ... experiences? by Jonathan Callen |
1 | Interesting that it includes fsck (any by the looks of |
2 | https://busybox.net/BusyBox.html, also fsck.minix) but none of the other |
3 | fsck's. The choice of mkfs is a different set, with mkfs.ext2, mkfs.minix, |
4 | mkfs.reiser, mkfs.vfat included. |