| 1 |
On Thu, 12 May 2011 07:54:13 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I just hope they also learned from their mistakes. Dropping KDE3 |
| 4 |
> support long before KDE4 was ready was a big one. That shouldn't be |
| 5 |
> repeated. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
If it's as good as everyone says, what more support did it need? Did the |
| 8 |
KDE guys come knocking on your door to remove it, or do it remotely |
| 9 |
(Android anyone?), or did it just keep working? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'd say that you got excellent value for money, and a lot more support |
| 12 |
for an EOL product than you paid for. Yes, it would have been nice if they |
| 13 |
had waited until KDE4 was a little more polished before EOLing KDE3, but |
| 14 |
who would have paid for two dev teams? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I thought I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... |
| 21 |
but it was just some sod with a torch bringing me more work! |
Archives