1 |
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:02:02AM -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote: |
3 |
<SNIP> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> There's nothing wrong with that, as long as you can ensure that any |
6 |
>> hard-coded paths to those binaries are updated properly. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Surely this is the same, whether one copies the booting software to |
9 |
> initramfs or /sbin, isn't it? |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
If it's 'hard coded' then I think it's not the same. Imagine a text |
13 |
script which specifically tries to find, say, '/usr/bin/ldd' as |
14 |
opposed to 'ldd'. ldd isn't there any more so the script just fails. |
15 |
|
16 |
Just a thought, |
17 |
Mark |