1 |
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff <yks-uno@××××××.ru> wrote: |
2 |
> In the end, I humbly believe it's up to me to judge what effect there is for |
3 |
> me on my computers. |
4 |
|
5 |
Yes, that's exactly the point. Scroll up and reread this thread, |
6 |
though, and you'll get the impression that some complainers seem to |
7 |
think that Lennart is breaking into their systems and magickally |
8 |
installing his 175-year old software in them. What's this about 100% |
9 |
of the users being "forced" to have pulseaudio in? |
10 |
|
11 |
And don't pretend you don't know what I'm talking about here. If |
12 |
somewhere up there we're talking about "enforced" choices we're not |
13 |
talking about gentoo, we're talking about stuff like Fedora or Ubuntu |
14 |
and even "enforced" is a stretch as you could always go with a |
15 |
minimal, alternate, or a forked desktop. And it's pretty obvious why |
16 |
they thought it was sane for pulse to be a default choice. |
17 |
|
18 |
Basically there's a bunch of vague criticisms of unnamed systems where |
19 |
"they" force stuff on "all users" for "no good reason". Nevermind that |
20 |
we can actually state what the reasons are. Fingers in the ears. |
21 |
neener neener. |
22 |
|
23 |
Well I have a better theory, "they" made choices for "defaults-using |
24 |
users" that "you can totally undo" for "pretty decent reasons" but |
25 |
"some of us" just want to "feel better" about the "choices" we made by |
26 |
"pointing and laughing" at the ones we didn't. Even when we know so |
27 |
"much" about the topic that someone actually has to tell us what a |
28 |
"sound server" is or what its "use cases" are and our "use patterns" |
29 |
involve typing things in a black box so that pretty text scrolls |
30 |
quickly and makes us "feel smart" whereas the use patterns of the |
31 |
average user, uh... "don't". |
32 |
|
33 |
It's a sane idea for a desktop distro to include pulse as a -default-. |
34 |
No, seriously, it is. Just, frigging bluetooth headsets. And |
35 |
per-application volume control. Are there other ways to go about it? |
36 |
Yeah. It remains to be seen how any of them are an order of magnitude |
37 |
better than pulse. You don't -like- it? Fine. There's no point in |
38 |
going on on some tirade about how the poor, oppressed 99% of users |
39 |
could have been doing just fine with ALSA just like you have with your |
40 |
more beautiful, hand-crafted system... |
41 |
-- |
42 |
This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [x] social |
43 |
Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no |
44 |
Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none |