Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: eix USE=security
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:49:49
Message-Id: 4EED1C3D.4020603@binarywings.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: eix USE=security by James
1 Am 17.12.2011 16:38, schrieb James:
2 > Florian Philipp <lists <at> binarywings.net> writes:
3 >
4 >>
5 >> Hi list!
6 >>
7 >> I just noticed the USE flag "security" in stable app-portage/eix. The
8 >> description is hardly helpful: It fixes exploits but is not enabled by
9 >> default. Why? What are the drawbacks? I couldn't find anything in a
10 >> quick online search.
11 >
12 > ef security
13 >
14 > This adds some checks which can prevent certain exploits if e.g. the eix code
15 > has a bug. If you use the hardened toolchain, using this flag does not increase
16 > security and can even lead to problems.
17 > install the security module needed for some servers
18 >
19 >
20
21 As I said, this description is hardly useful. If it fixes exploits, then
22 why is it not enabled for non-hardened profiles per default?

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: eix USE=security Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>