1 |
On 2014-08-16, behrouz khosravi <bz.khosravi@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> So can you please tell me why you have chosen a specific DE and not |
4 |
> the other options ? |
5 |
|
6 |
I've been running XFCE for a long time. |
7 |
|
8 |
Before that, I didn't have a "Desktop Environment" at all, just the |
9 |
fvwm window manager which I started using back before Linux kernel |
10 |
version 1.00 came out [before Linux and fvwm were around, I mostly |
11 |
used the "twm" window manager]. At some point many years ago, there |
12 |
was some problem with fvwm that I couldn't work-around (I don't even |
13 |
remember what it was). I tried Gnome and KDE, but they were just _way_ |
14 |
too big and slow, and they both seemed to think that the desktop was |
15 |
the be-all-and-end-all of computation and should always being the |
16 |
center of your attention and the user-up of all resources. |
17 |
|
18 |
I run a computer in order to run various apps. The desktop is just |
19 |
there to manage windows and facilitate running those apps. It should |
20 |
otherwise stay out of the way, out of sight, and out of memory. |
21 |
|
22 |
XFCE does a pretty good job of that. XFCE isn't too big. XFCE |
23 |
doesn't think it should always be the star of the show and the center |
24 |
of everybody's attention. XFCE is stable: it doesn't get completely |
25 |
re-designed, re-skinned, and broken every few years because people |
26 |
finally figured how to actually use the old version and some new batch |
27 |
of developers are bored and want to spray their scent all over |
28 |
everything |
29 |
|
30 |
Here's what my XFCE desktop looks like: |
31 |
|
32 |
http://www.panix.com/~grante/desktop.png |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Were these parsnips |
36 |
at CORRECTLY MARINATED in |
37 |
gmail.com TACO SAUCE? |