| 1 |
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 02/03/2016 17:49, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7886940.html |
| 4 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576128 |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> They changed ABI without changing SONAME, which is an absolutely |
| 7 |
>> braid-dead thing for upstream to do, because it causes exactly this |
| 8 |
>> kind of breakage. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> brain dead is being kind to folks with non-functioning brains... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I'm now seriously considering the libressl folks might have a point. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You mean the project that forked openssl, changed the APIs and ABIs, |
| 16 |
and also kept the same SONAMEs for "compatibility?" We can see how |
| 17 |
well that worked with libav... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives