Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: BRM <bm_witness@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server 1.7.
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:04:54
Message-Id: 989087.52850.qm@web65409.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server 1.7. by Neil Bothwick
1 ----- Original Message ----
2
3 > From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
4 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
5 > Sent: Sat, April 10, 2010 9:14:56 AM
6 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server 1.7.
7 > > After that you kann kill X without disturbing the kernel (and risk your
8 > > data) with ALT-Backspace. You will get back a console. Log in as root
9 > > and do a "telinit 2" since the setuo still think of running runlevel 5
10 > > "without X" and this is not a sane setup: Runlevel 5 is "with X" and
11 > > runlevel 2 is "without X".
12 > This is Gentoo, not Red Hat.
13
14 And isn't it:
15
16 Run Level 1 - Single user w/o network
17 Run Level 2 - Multiuser w/o network
18 Run Level 3 - Multiuser w/ network
19 Run Level 4 - Multiuser w/ network+X
20 Run Level 5 - unassigned (typically same as Run Level 3)
21
22 So it would have to think it's in Run Level 4 not 5, which is still a sane setup, just incorrect by convention.
23
24 Or did LSB change the conventions?
25
26 Ben

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server 1.7. Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>