1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:47 on Thursday 02 June 2011, Indi did opine |
2 |
thusly: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Maybe before throwing out the baby with the bathwater he should do some |
5 |
> more testing in another browser. In the past I've seen behavior not |
6 |
> unlike that described due to flash, but if flash is the culprit it will |
7 |
> show up using firefox or konqueror or whatever. |
8 |
|
9 |
I've seen various combinations of flash-replacements, browsers and hackery |
10 |
(nspluginwrapper comes to mind) do similar things - send a machine haywire and |
11 |
sometimes even lock it up solid. But in each case it's been a new commit to |
12 |
the tree, many more than 1 user was affected and we heard about it here almost |
13 |
right away. |
14 |
|
15 |
That isn't the case this time. Woth checking, I just don't hold out much hope |
16 |
it's anything other than flash itself (especially given it's track record). |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |