Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

[John Runyon]

Not proc, but you should add nofail to scanner.

John Runyon
Sent from my phone

On Dec 19, 2015 2:59 PM, thelma@×××××××××××.com wrote:
>
> On 12/19/2015 12:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >>>
> >> It seems I'm not the only one:
> >> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1034770-highlight-localmount.html
> >>
> >> "The problem was openrc-0.18.4. When I downgraded to openrc-0.16.4 the
> >> problem went away."
> >>
> >> Now, I can not downgrade without eth0 working.
> >> Do I need to boot strap and downgrade or is there is easier solution?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thelma
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Here is a news item that explains the situation.
> >
> > 2015-10-07-openrc-0-18-localmount-and-netmount-changes
> >   Title                     OpenRC-0.18 localmount and netmount changes
> >   Author                    William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
> >   Posted                    2015-10-07
> >   Revision                  1
> >
> > The behaviour of localmount and netmount is changing on Linux systems.
> > In the past, these services always started successfully. However, now they
> > will fail if a file system they attempt to mount cannot be mounted.
> >
> > If you have file systems listed in fstab which should not be mounted at
> > boot time, make sure to add noauto to the mount options. If you have
> > file systems that you want to attempt to mount at boot time but failure
> > should be allowed, add nofail to the mount options for these file
> > systems in fstab.
> >
>
> This is my fstab:
> /dev/hda1 /boot ext2 noauto,noatime 1 1
> /dev/hda3 / ext3 noatime 0 1
> /dev/hda2 none swap sw 0 0
> /dev/hda4 /home ext3 noatime   0 1
>
> /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,ro,users 0 0
> /dev/hdd                /mnt/dvdr       auto         noauto,users            0 0
>
> # Scanner
> none   /proc/bus/usb   usbfs           defaults,devmode=0666   0 0
>
> none /proc proc defaults 0 0
>
> Does it mean I should add: "nofail" to Scanner and "/proc" line?
>
> --
> Thelma
>