| 1 |
Heinz Sporn wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Donnerstag, den 22.09.2005, 16:26 +0800 schrieb Qiangning Hong: |
| 3 |
>>Isn't CIFS considered as a better SMBFS? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> It's been said. Still - do you have both SMBFS and CIFS support built |
| 6 |
> into your kernel, or just CIFS? If the later is true I would include |
| 7 |
> SMBFS as well and try the same thing with good old SMB as well (you may |
| 8 |
> use both simultanously anyway). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I add smbfs support in my kernel and tried (after change the filename to |
| 11 |
an English-only one). It works. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
However, as my previous mail said, using smbfs doesn't address my |
| 14 |
problem. I have plenty (~100) large files to transfer, and maybe you've |
| 15 |
guessed, they are movie files, with Chinese movie title in the |
| 16 |
filenames. And the movies directories on my winbox have also Chinese |
| 17 |
characters. If I stick in the smbfs solution, I'll have to do too many |
| 18 |
manual filename change things. So, I still prefer to find out what's |
| 19 |
wrong with my cifs and fix it. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> Interessting details missing: your kernel and windoze version? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Linux r52 2.6.13-suspend2-r4 #4 Wed Sep 21 17:35:55 CST 2005 i686 |
| 24 |
Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Windows XP Professional with SP2. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Qiangning Hong |
| 30 |
http://www.hn.org/hongqn (RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/hongqn) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Registered Linux User #396996 |
| 33 |
Get Firefox! <http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=67907&t=1> |
| 34 |
Thunderbird! <http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=67907&t=183> |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives