| 1 |
On Monday, August 11, 2014 10:45:07 PM Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 11 Aug 2014 20:01:16 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > isn't it great? back in the days when kmail stored emails in files, |
| 4 |
> > everything worked great and even folders with 100k mails were not a |
| 5 |
> > problem. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > But, no, they had to break that. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I lost ca 500k emails thanks to akonadi-crap and errors like that. I |
| 10 |
> > really loved kmail and thunderbird is garbage compared - but akonadi |
| 11 |
> > took away that choice. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Thank you, kdepim-devs for making the dumbest decision ever! *thumbsup* |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I share your feelings although I haven't lost messages in my current attempt |
| 16 |
> to road test kmail2. I am dreading the moment when kmail1 will stop |
| 17 |
> working due to bitrot and I'll have to make a choice. :-( |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
With a modern machine and the latest versions, it's not too bad and responds |
| 20 |
quicker then kmail-1 did. With the old version, I often had kmail become |
| 21 |
unresponsive when synchronizing the email. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I didn't loose any emails, but that is more likely related to the emails being |
| 24 |
stored on an imap server, rather then being lucky. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I really don't see the point of forcing mysql as a backend. Sqlite would have |
| 27 |
been a better choice. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Joost |
Archives