Re: (Was) Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update behavior

[Michael Mol]

Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 Jan 2012 14:55:38 Michael Mol wrote:
>> Michael Mol wrote:
>>> Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
>>>> On 02.01.2012 18:58, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>>>> On 01/02/12 12:47, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>>>>> Again, 'equery depends' will tell you if any package locatable
>>>>>> through the @world hierarchy needs the package. No need to
>>>>>> uninstall anything to do that level of investigation.
>>>>>> revdep-rebuild -I is also useful, although more historically than
>>>>>> now.
>>>>>
>>>>> This was essentially Michal Mol's suggestion, and I gave an
>>>>> example where it would remove something important.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Really, the proposal to 'fix --update' doesn't address really
>>>>>> knowing what your system is running and why. Get to the root of
>>>>>> that and the --update thing becomes the non-issue that many of us
>>>>>> think it is.
>>>>>
>>>>> This would be a suggestion to travel back in time and document
>>>>> something that I have no way of knowing now.
>>>>
>>>> You could create your own overlay with "meta"-ebuilds, e. g.
>>>> system-maintenance, customer1, customer2.
>>>> Inside the ebuilds you define depends on the packages the customer
>>>> wants. Doing so you could wipe everything except the "meta"-ebuilds
>>>> from world. When a customer quits you can unmerge his or her
>>>> "meta"-ebuild and depclean.
>>>> If you add everything needed to the respective "meta"-ebuild, you'll
>>>> always be on the safe side.
>>>
>>> Getting EnigMail set up on a Seamonkey/Win7 box, and Enigmail is
>>> complaining that your signature is unverified. I don't know/understand
>>> PGP/GPG all that well, but I think this is something you're supposed to
>>> be able to fix on your end. If that's not the case, let me know, and
>>> I'll get it fixed on my end. :)
>>>
>>> gpg command line and output:
>>> C:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe
>>> gpg: Signature made 01/03/12 09:05:56 using RSA key ID 8D16461C
>>> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>>
>> Doh...that was supposed to go directly to Hinnerk. "Reply to sender
>> only" my hind leg...
>
> Looks like a recently created gpg key.  Assuming the owner has uploaded it to
> a public key server, it seems likely that it has not propagated across the
> public servers yet and your enigmail plugin alerts you about it.

Mick, yours gives me the same error:

gpg command line and output:
C:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe
gpg: Signature made 01/03/12 11:01:03 using DSA key ID 792968B6
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found

Though trying querying for 8D16461C or 792968B6 at
pool.sks-keyservers.net or subkeys.pgp.net gives me "no key found" errors.