Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From:	Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
To:	gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: changing CHOST in stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] default stage3)
Date:	Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:03:02
Message-Id:	`7573e9640511222155h41940143t6d564d7c4a0bf6e9@mail.gmail.com`
In Reply to:	Re: changing CHOST in stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] default stage3) by Richard Fish

1	On 11/22/05, Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote:
2	> AFAIK, there should be no difference in code produced by
3	> "i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc" and "i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -march=i586". If
4	> there is, then things like distcc should be horribly broken.
5
6	Well, I've been following a related thread on gentoo-dev, and it seems
7	I am wrong with regards to building glibc. CHOST is much more
8	important for glibc, leading to the support (or lack thereof) of
9	things like nptl.
10
11	http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106556
12
13	So for getting a completely compatible i586 install, you may have to
14	risk changing CHOST, since there is no i586 tarball available.
15
16	-Richard
17
18	--
19	gentoo-user@g.o mailing list