Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Roy Wright <royw@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:43:37
Message-Id: 459D3B19.6080505@cisco.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG! by Richard Fish
1 Richard Fish wrote:
2 > It's always helpful if you tell us your arch when you post things like
3 > this. Regardless, 1.4.6 was stabilized for x86 on Dec 7th, and for
4 > amd64 on Dec 8th:
5 >
6 > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-crypt/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.6.ebuild?rev=1.9&view=log
7 >
8 >
9 > -Richard
10
11 Kind of a side issue for ~x86, but the slotting of gnupg is kind of funky:
12
13 [I] app-crypt/gnupg
14 Available versions:
15 (0) 1.4.2.2 1.4.4 1.4.5 (~)1.4.5-r1 1.4.5-r2 1.4.6
16 (~)2.0.1-r1 (~)2.0.1-r2
17 (1.9) 1.9.20-r3 (~)1.9.21 (~)1.9.21-r1 (~)1.9.22 (~)1.9.94
18 (~)2.0.0 (~)2.0.1
19
20 This caused me some blocking, so ended up removing 1.4.6 and 2.0.1 to allow
21 2.0.1-r2.
22
23 >From what I gather, the intent is to eliminate having two versions (slot
24 0 & 1.9)
25 installed in favor of gnupg-2.*
26
27 Is there any references for what is really going on?
28
29 TIA,
30 Roy
31 --
32 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list