| 1 |
No, you *add* qt4 to your make.conf if you need it. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
You probably still have packages that use qt3, so unless you want to unmerge |
| 4 |
them... |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Think of it this way. Nobody in their right mind will ever get qt and gtk+ |
| 7 |
confused. You can have both and intermingle them, and the flags do not depend |
| 8 |
on each other. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Qt and Qt4 are just like that, they are that different. You cannot upgrade a |
| 11 |
Qt app to use Qt4 (unless you are willing to use some compat layer), just as |
| 12 |
you cannot upgrade a Qt app to use GTK+ |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 22:24:32 Anthony Mutiso wrote: |
| 20 |
> So for those that *had* qt in make.conf, (like me), the right thing to |
| 21 |
> do is to change it to qt4? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 24 |
> > Yes. The difference is huge. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > KDE-3 uses Qt |
| 27 |
> > KDE-4 uses Qt4 |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > They are so different that a name change from Qt to something else would |
| 31 |
> > be entirely acceptable. |
Archives