1 |
On 2018-12-20, YUE Daian wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 2018-12-20 03:50, Nils Freydank <nils.freydank@××××××.de> wrote: |
4 |
>> Hi Danny, |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> first I want to thank you for submitting your ebuild, and I'm quite sorry to |
7 |
>> see another contributor who doesn't get responses for a long while. This is no |
8 |
>> evil intention, just a lack of manpower and the lack of someone maintaining |
9 |
>> your "new" package. (This was what jstein meant with his response[1]). |
10 |
>> |
11 |
> I do understand the situation of lacking manpower, also I realized made |
12 |
> some mistakes in my ebuild file, so you do not have to apologize. :-) |
13 |
> |
14 |
>> Additionally bugzilla is seen as too impractical to use for new packages that |
15 |
>> many don't get much attention there, only on github.com. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
> Well the Gentoo Wiki https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Submitting_ebuilds |
18 |
> suggested that new ebuilds should be submitted via Bugzilla. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Could you please tell me if it is still the recommended way? |
21 |
> If not, IMHO it is better to change Wiki as well to prevent further |
22 |
> misunderstanding. |
23 |
|
24 |
I would like to ask again for a clarification about this. Last month, I |
25 |
asked if there was some rule against using bugzilla, but there were no |
26 |
replies: |
27 |
|
28 |
https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-user&m=154318918422492&w=2 |
29 |
|
30 |
I do understand lack of manpower can affect new package requests. But |
31 |
there are also bug reports with patches that have had zero feedback so |
32 |
far. Of course these will also be affected by a manpower shortage, but |
33 |
should be easier to handle than new package requests? |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Nuno Silva |