| 1 |
On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:06:22 Stroller wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 12 March 2014, at 4:01 pm, Francesco Turco <fturco@××××××××.fm> |
| 3 |
wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> is the published MD5-hash still valid? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso |
| 7 |
> > e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Yes, the published MD5 hash is still valid. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Since this thread seems to have taken on a life of its own, and because |
| 12 |
> no-one else has done so, I just wanted to check in and say this is the |
| 13 |
> md5sum I'm getting, too. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I was careful to use the switch.ch URL that Guido gave in his first |
| 16 |
> message. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Stroller. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Ha! Could it be that the mirror has a corrupt iso, or is the DIGEST file |
| 21 |
hashes wrong?! |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'm on a metered ADSL connection here so I won't download the iso from |
| 24 |
different mirrors to compare, but someone else or the OP could do that, as has |
| 25 |
already been suggested in a previous post. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
Mick |
Archives