| 1 |
On 23 August 2005 20:14, Holly Bostick wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Sorry, forgot this in my other posting. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Oh, and btw, Nagatoro... it's silly, but just open up your grub.conf |
| 6 |
> with nano and make sure that some word-wrap somewhere didn't mess up |
| 7 |
> your kernel line. That happened to me a couple of times, and in that |
| 8 |
> respect, Matthias is on to something: if the line wraps to another line |
| 9 |
> (with some kind of soft return), and is not really all on one line as it |
| 10 |
> is supposed to be, the second half of the kernel line (after the soft |
| 11 |
> wrap) will be ignored. So opening up the file with nano and going to the |
| 12 |
> beginning of any apparently wrapped line and hitting Backspace to pull |
| 13 |
> it all together is not a bad idea. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
This can be easily proved. Do "cat /proc/cmdline" and check whether the output |
| 16 |
matches the line in grub.conf. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Uwe |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
95% of all programmers rate themselves among the top 5% of all software |
| 22 |
developers. - Linus Torvalds |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
http://www.uwix.iway.na (last updated: 20.06.2004) |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives