| 1 |
On 24/07/2013 12:52, Pavel Volkov wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Yohan Pereira <yohan.pereira@×××××.com |
| 6 |
> <mailto:yohan.pereira@×××××.com>> wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> On 24/07/13 at 02:00pm, Pavel Volkov wrote: |
| 9 |
> > It initially suported set arithmetic (you could writes expressions |
| 10 |
> like |
| 11 |
> > "@set1+@set2/@set3"), I wonder why it was dropped :) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Wow thats intresting. What could the / operator possibly do in the case |
| 14 |
> of sets? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I'm not sure about the correct notation but I think it was intersection. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Difference actually :-) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I can't think how intersection could be generally useful in portage |
| 23 |
sets. Maybe it was in the first draft just for completeness? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 29 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives