1 |
James wrote: |
2 |
> Hello, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> So another day, another borked set of installs. This really got me thinking |
5 |
> as I have been munging around a multitude of gentoo(ish) installation |
6 |
> options. What I really would appreciate is some feedback on the Planning |
7 |
> Questions listed below, as to help folks organized their thoughts and |
8 |
> hardware details BEFORE actually performing an install or test-drive. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> It has dawned on me that an expansive set of Planning Questions that should |
12 |
> be answered prior to installation might be one posible way for those new |
13 |
> to gentoo to decide critial issues before choosing from the possible install |
14 |
> semantics for their given set of choices (constraints). As the matrix of |
15 |
> installation choices grows, so to can options for installation. If a given |
16 |
> set of choices does not have a viable installation pathway, of is just not |
17 |
> recommended, then that should be clearly explained. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Later on, a web interface and (a similarly in functional) GUI that is |
21 |
> extensible for installation media also) can be developed to enhance the |
22 |
> presentation of the decision processes. A graphical decision matrix |
23 |
> (row-column table initially). The handbook seems to be sort of moving |
24 |
> this direction anyway. A recent discussion of the dev list showed |
25 |
> encouragement for pointing gentoo-noobs to some of the gentoo derivative |
26 |
> distros for a quick install experience. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Many/most of these options exist, some atrophying currently, it's just not |
30 |
> straightforward for folks to discern the best route to their desired final |
31 |
> result. When new installation semantics [1] mature, the installation matrix |
32 |
> can be modified to include those options as links. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Install PreQualifying Matrx::QUESTIONS |
37 |
> .................................................................... |
38 |
> .................................................................... |
39 |
> .................................................................... |
40 |
> Live Testdrive options before installation(usb/cd/dvd):: |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Intended Usage (workstation/server/device/) |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Hardware or Vitual installation:: |
45 |
> |
46 |
> PC mobo or tablet/embedded/device:: |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Processor/Ram characteristics:: |
49 |
> |
50 |
> MBR vs (u)EFI (type of mobo):: |
51 |
> |
52 |
> Single or Multi or RAID disk configuration:: |
53 |
> |
54 |
> OpenRC or Systemd:: |
55 |
> |
56 |
> Grub1 vs Grub2 or other boot-semantics:: |
57 |
> |
58 |
> File System type(s):: |
59 |
> |
60 |
> |
61 |
> James |
62 |
> |
63 |
> [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:RelEng_GRS |
64 |
> |
65 |
> |
66 |
> |
67 |
> |
68 |
|
69 |
|
70 |
I can't help much but will give my 2 cents worth. Grub, I switched to |
71 |
grub2 and it works. If you decide on grub1, keep in mind, I don't think |
72 |
it is maintained anymore. Some "new" stuff may not ever work with it |
73 |
and you may end up switching whether you want to or not. I think it is |
74 |
Neil that uses some other boot loader that he is happy with. Maybe he |
75 |
will chime in on it's name. I think it is a lot like Grub1 but |
76 |
currently maintained. |
77 |
|
78 |
I used resiserfs for ages. It sort of died a while back and at this |
79 |
point, I'm not sure if anyone is maintaining it at all. When I switched |
80 |
from reiserfs, I went to ext4. So far, I've had a drive to outright |
81 |
start failing hardware wise with only a loss of the data that was on |
82 |
that bad spot. The rest was fine. I have a UPS here so I can't really |
83 |
say much about how it handles a power fail or being rudely removed. All |
84 |
I can say is this, I'm happy with it so far. Others here like the |
85 |
shiney new BTRFS. I don't use it but maybe others can share their |
86 |
experience. I also use LVM and it just works, so far. |
87 |
|
88 |
I'm not sure what you want regarding Processor and Ram. I have a AMD |
89 |
Phenom II X4 955. That's 4 cores running at 3.2GHz. Libreoffice |
90 |
usually takes around 2 hours to compile. Firefox takes around 45 |
91 |
minutes. I have 16Gbs and have portage's work directory on tmpfs. I |
92 |
hope to upgrade both CPU and ram at some point. Hope to go to 8 cores |
93 |
at 4GHz and to 32GBs of ram. Hope. Ka ching. $$$$$$ |
94 |
|
95 |
I use openrc. Not going to start a flame war so leaving it at that. ;-) |
96 |
|
97 |
Hope other will also share and help give you ideas. |
98 |
|
99 |
Dale |
100 |
|
101 |
:-) :-) |