| 1 |
Nikos Chantziaras ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> On 02/26/2010 03:15 AM, bn wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hi, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> I have a stable x86 system that requires still a bit of updating, among |
| 6 |
>> those libtool and gcc. Since I need the system to be usable *now* for |
| 7 |
>> work reasons, I don't feel like updating gcc and rebuilding it all with |
| 8 |
>> an emerge -e system / emerge -e world, but more and more packages want |
| 9 |
>> to upgrade to libtool 2.x |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Is it safe to upgrade libtool without (1)rebuilding gcc too and |
| 12 |
>> (2)rebuilding system/world? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I don't know, but for this type of scenario you are better off building |
| 15 |
> binary packages of everything that need to be updated without actually |
| 16 |
> installing any of it on the machine. At the end, when all binaries have |
| 17 |
> been created by portage, you can install them in one go at a convenient |
| 18 |
> point. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Look up the "--buildpkgonly" option of emerge for this. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Looks like an excellent suggestion, I didn't think of that. Thanks! |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Anyway, if someone else knows the answer to the libtool question, I'd be |
| 25 |
happy, if only for learning purposes :) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
m. |
Archives