Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: umm, google.... WAS: Kernel Modules
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:25:24
Message-Id: 201106092223.11523.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Modules by YouTube Support
1 How exceptionally interesting, as I didn't mail youtube...
2
3 Headers of what I did send:
4
5 From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
6 X-KMail-Identity: 1726407999
7 X-KMail-Transport: Gmail
8 X-KMail-Fcc: .Community.directory/gentoo-user
9 To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
10 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Modules
11 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:37:30 +0200
12 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; )
13 References: <4DF0A5FA.1020602@×××××.com>
14 <201106092018.37311.alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> <4DF118FC.2030805@×××××.com>
15 In-Reply-To: <4DF118FC.2030805@×××××.com>
16 X-KMail-Link-Message: 96095
17 X-KMail-Link-Type: reply
18 X-KMail-QuotePrefix: >
19 MIME-Version: 1.0
20 Content-Type: Text/Plain;
21 charset="utf-8"
22 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
23 Message-Id: <201106092137.30415.alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
24 Status: RO
25 X-Status: RS
26 X-KMail-EncryptionState: N
27 X-KMail-SignatureState: N
28 X-KMail-MDN-Sent:
29
30 I wonder if this one will do the same.
31
32
33
34 Apparently, though unproven, at 21:44 on Thursday 09 June 2011, YouTube
35 Support did opine thusly:
36
37 > You are receiving this automated reply because you have sent mail to
38 > an invalid email address. If you are trying to contact YouTube,
39 > please visit the YouTube Help Center at:
40 > http://www.google.com/support/youtube
41 >
42 > If you're unable to find the answer to your question in the Help
43 > Center, you may use the contact forms located there to send us your
44 > question.
45 >
46 >
47 >
48 > Original Message Follows:
49 > ------------------------
50 > From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
51 > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Modules
52 > Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:37:30 +0200
53 >
54 > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:03 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Dale did
55 > opine
56 >
57 > thusly:
58 > > Alan McKinnon wrote:
59 > > > Sure, but I can use ln in my sleep.
60 > > >
61 > > > eselect OTOH, is something I always have to run bit by bit to recall
62 >
63 > the
64 >
65 > > > invocation. That's just way too much effort for this here old git....
66 > >
67 > > I'm still not used to eselect and its options. They are sensible but I
68 > > just haven't got the hang of it. I been practicing tho. I do eselect
69 > > modules list then go from there. You are right tho Alan, in the end, it
70 > > takes longer. I bet it was supposed to save time too. lol
71 >
72 > On the whole, eselect is a good idea, just some of it's modules are
73 > extreme.
74 >
75 > eselect opengl and eselect python are just two examples of things I have
76 > no
77 > idea how to accomplish manually
78
79 --
80 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: umm, google.... WAS: Kernel Modules Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>