1 |
How exceptionally interesting, as I didn't mail youtube... |
2 |
|
3 |
Headers of what I did send: |
4 |
|
5 |
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
6 |
X-KMail-Identity: 1726407999 |
7 |
X-KMail-Transport: Gmail |
8 |
X-KMail-Fcc: .Community.directory/gentoo-user |
9 |
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
10 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Modules |
11 |
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:37:30 +0200 |
12 |
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) |
13 |
References: <4DF0A5FA.1020602@×××××.com> |
14 |
<201106092018.37311.alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> <4DF118FC.2030805@×××××.com> |
15 |
In-Reply-To: <4DF118FC.2030805@×××××.com> |
16 |
X-KMail-Link-Message: 96095 |
17 |
X-KMail-Link-Type: reply |
18 |
X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > |
19 |
MIME-Version: 1.0 |
20 |
Content-Type: Text/Plain; |
21 |
charset="utf-8" |
22 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
23 |
Message-Id: <201106092137.30415.alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
24 |
Status: RO |
25 |
X-Status: RS |
26 |
X-KMail-EncryptionState: N |
27 |
X-KMail-SignatureState: N |
28 |
X-KMail-MDN-Sent: |
29 |
|
30 |
I wonder if this one will do the same. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:44 on Thursday 09 June 2011, YouTube |
35 |
Support did opine thusly: |
36 |
|
37 |
> You are receiving this automated reply because you have sent mail to |
38 |
> an invalid email address. If you are trying to contact YouTube, |
39 |
> please visit the YouTube Help Center at: |
40 |
> http://www.google.com/support/youtube |
41 |
> |
42 |
> If you're unable to find the answer to your question in the Help |
43 |
> Center, you may use the contact forms located there to send us your |
44 |
> question. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Original Message Follows: |
49 |
> ------------------------ |
50 |
> From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
51 |
> Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Modules |
52 |
> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:37:30 +0200 |
53 |
> |
54 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 21:03 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Dale did |
55 |
> opine |
56 |
> |
57 |
> thusly: |
58 |
> > Alan McKinnon wrote: |
59 |
> > > Sure, but I can use ln in my sleep. |
60 |
> > > |
61 |
> > > eselect OTOH, is something I always have to run bit by bit to recall |
62 |
> |
63 |
> the |
64 |
> |
65 |
> > > invocation. That's just way too much effort for this here old git.... |
66 |
> > |
67 |
> > I'm still not used to eselect and its options. They are sensible but I |
68 |
> > just haven't got the hang of it. I been practicing tho. I do eselect |
69 |
> > modules list then go from there. You are right tho Alan, in the end, it |
70 |
> > takes longer. I bet it was supposed to save time too. lol |
71 |
> |
72 |
> On the whole, eselect is a good idea, just some of it's modules are |
73 |
> extreme. |
74 |
> |
75 |
> eselect opengl and eselect python are just two examples of things I have |
76 |
> no |
77 |
> idea how to accomplish manually |
78 |
|
79 |
-- |
80 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |