Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: thelma@×××××××××××.com
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:25:18
Message-Id: 7527fe1f-53d8-3c06-010c-85400748b4c0@sys-concept.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase) by Helmut Jarausch
1 On 03/27/2018 03:19 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
2 > On 03/26/2018 01:30:19 PM, thelma@×××××××××××.com wrote:
3 >> I've switched one of my older box to desktop profile-17 updated gcc to
4 >> 6.4.0-r1 and it compile just fine.
5 >> But when I do  emerge -e @world
6 >> recompile gcc-6.4.0-r1 get stuck on"
7 >>
8 >> * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies:
9 >>  *
10 >>  *   >=dev-libs/mpfr-2.4.2:0/0= pulled in by:
11 >>  *     (sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0-r1:6.4.0/6.4.0::gentoo, installed)
12 >>
13 >
14 > I'd try to emerge dev-libs/mpfr  (version 3.1.6 is on stable) first.
15 >
16 > Helmut
17
18 I did emerged "dev-libs/mpfr" (I'm on latest stable) gcc-6.4.0.-r1 still
19 failed to compile itself with MAKEOPTS="-j5"
20
21 SOLVED!
22 The gcc-6.4.0-r1 compiled with
23 MAKEOPTS="-j1"
24
25 What is strange is that this is the second low profile system that
26 gcc-6.4.0-r1 failed to compile large package. My other boxed was 4-core
27 and 4GB of RAM and I had to switch to MAKEOPTS="-j1"
28
29 The above system is: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz with 2GB of RAM
30 and "gcc-4.9.4" compiled "gcc-6.4.0-r1" with MAKEOPTS="-j5" OK
31 but when I switched/upgrade profile to "gcc-6.4.0-r1" it filed to
32 compile gcc-6.4.0 with MAKEOPTS="-j5"
33 I had lower MAKEOPTS to -j1
34
35 So it seems to me the gcc-6.4.0-r1 much more resource hungry or there is
36 a bug in it.
37 --
38 Thelma

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase) Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>