1 |
On 4/21/20 12:58 PM, Consus wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> In all honesty, is Gentoo dead? Gentoo-Dev is filled with passive |
5 |
> aggression (though being developers-only mailing list), Github bot warns |
6 |
> you that contributing new packages to the main repo is low priority and |
7 |
> probably no one will help you, and even distribution kernel is not an |
8 |
> official thing, but a desperate attempt of someone to fix things. |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
With all respect, you are clueless, but trying to be polite. If your |
13 |
assessment was correct, then answer these questions, OK? |
14 |
|
15 |
Why would the actual author of one of the hottest codes in the world, |
16 |
wireguard, be that actual maintainer on gentoo? |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
Gentoo spawns CoreOS(smarty pants CTO) and long time gentooer. CoreOS |
20 |
purchase by Redhat, to give them a future and IBM purchasing Redhat, |
21 |
just to get legal rights to the gentoo heritage? |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
Greg X, is one of THE chief gentoo kernel devs, and still loves and uses |
25 |
Gentoo.? |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
You are among GREATNESS in the computational world. I could list |
29 |
hundreds of the world's top technologies in a wide variety of fields, |
30 |
that have and still use Gentoo. |
31 |
Like the worlds number one RF designer; but I wont. |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
You are fucking lazy. READ as the entire history and tree(s) are there. |
35 |
BUT, first do a deep dive on C, although not currently popular, before |
36 |
making such stupid statements. PLEASE. |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
Also, find me a linux distro rigorously supports (and engourages) both |
40 |
systemd, OpenRC and systems without either? Can you name one. |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
Gentoo is for experts, and those that aspire, through many years of hard |
44 |
work, to become C/unix/kernel/any-code type of experts. |
45 |
|
46 |
YOU, making this statement, are just LAZY! |
47 |
|
48 |
get real, |
49 |
James Horton, PE |