| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Graphite *can* improve the performance of some packages, but might worsen the performance of others. You might want to read through this thread: |
| 4 |
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1052716-start-0-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-.html |
| 5 |
Personally, I enable it on a per package basis, python's performance gets a bit better with it. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Regards, |
| 8 |
Rasmus |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-------- Original Message -------- |
| 13 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc with graphite flag? |
| 14 |
Local Time: 30 April 2017 4:04 PM |
| 15 |
UTC Time: 30 April 2017 14:04 |
| 16 |
From: joost@××××××××.org |
| 17 |
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
On Sunday, April 30, 2017 2:18:42 PM CEST Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 20 |
> On 04/30/2017 05:25 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 21 |
> > So much for that wiki entry. BTW, I ended up putting... |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > sys-devel/gcc graphite |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > ...in package.use. The "graphite" USE flag means something entirely |
| 26 |
> > different for harfbuzz, i.e. build against media-libs/harfbuzz against |
| 27 |
> > media-gfx/graphite2 |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Btw, I don't think that USE flag is useful for anything, unless you put |
| 30 |
> the graphite optimization flags in your CFLAGS (-floop-interchange |
| 31 |
> -floop-strip-mine -floop-block). If you don't use those, there shouldn't |
| 32 |
> be a reason to enable the graphite flag. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Is there any benefit from using graphite and these CFLAGS on a current Gentoo |
| 35 |
system? |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Using a simple google-search, I can't find anything recent. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Joost |
Archives