Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: [SOLVED] Re: pdftk - replacement
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 21:38:08
Message-Id: p8eov7$p1h$1@blaine.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] Re: pdftk - replacement by thelma@sys-concept.com
1 On 2018-03-15, thelma@×××××××××××.com <thelma@×××××××××××.com> wrote:
2
3 > I've compiled the pdftk-9999 (java based)
4 > gcc-5.4.0-r4 is gone and pdftk is working as it should.
5 >
6 > Thank you everybody for the help.
7
8 That's great news!
9
10 Instead of removing pdftk from the portage tree because it depends on
11 gcc-5.4 [gcj], is there any reason it can't be replace by the one
12 which uses a jvm instead?
13
14 --
15 Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Thousands of days of
16 at civilians ... have produced
17 gmail.com a ... feeling for the
18 aesthetic modules --

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [SOLVED] Re: pdftk - replacement "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>
[gentoo-user] Re: [SOLVED] Re: pdftk - replacement Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>