| 1 |
On 8/2/05, Craig Duncan <craigduncan@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Qiangning Hong wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> >The gcc version on livecd (2004.3) is 3.3.x, but I want use |
| 5 |
> >-march=pentium-m in my CFLAGS and gcc 3.3.x doesn't support it. So I |
| 6 |
> >add the following line in /etc/portage/package.keywords: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >sys-devel/gcc ~x86 |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> >gcc-3.3.6? I don't need it! I have gcc-3.4.4 unmasked! |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> No, package.keywords is architecture specific, to unmask a package, add |
| 15 |
> it to /etc/portage/package.unmask. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I thought there is a kind of mask named "mask by KEYWORDS" :) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Well, whatever, I add "=sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4" to |
| 20 |
/etc/portage/packae.unmask and find that gcc-3.3.6 still is to be |
| 21 |
emerged: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
# emerge -ept system | grep gcc |
| 24 |
[ebuild N ] sys-devel/gcc-3.3.6 |
| 25 |
[ebuild N ] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4 |
| 26 |
[ebuild N ] sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.11-r4 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
And from the tree output, I find that gcc-3.4.4 is listed as a |
| 29 |
dependence of gcc-3.3.6. ??? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
What further I need to do to get rid of installing gcc-3.3.6 in my system? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Qiangning Hong |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I'm usually annoyed by IDEs because, for instance, they don't use VIM |
| 38 |
as an editor. Since I'm hooked to that, all IDEs I've used so far have |
| 39 |
failed to impress me. |
| 40 |
-- Sybren Stuvel @ c.l.python |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Get Firefox! <http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=67907&t=1> |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives