Archives
Archives
| From: | Jarry <mr.jarry@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:11:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5176F8A8.2090107@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? by Alan McKinnon |
||
| 1 | On 23-Apr-13 22:40, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > ext4 is fine. All the horror stories ended years ago and almost all |
| 4 | > major distros ship it as a default. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Hm, I remember one horror story about "ext4 data corruption bug" |
| 7 | which circulated in public just a few months ago: |
| 8 | https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/690 |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Jarry |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | _______________________________________________________________ |
| 13 | This mailbox accepts e-mails only from selected mailing-lists! |
| 14 | Everything else is considered to be spam and therefore deleted. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? | Andrew Hoffman <andy.hoffman12@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? | Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |