| 1 |
pk wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2011-08-10 22:38, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> my CPU works, that shouldn't be the problem. I'll wait until it at |
| 6 |
>> least gets out of beta. ;-) We all know my record on breaking things. |
| 7 |
>> lol |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> Yes, if you feel there's nothing wrong with your CPU perhaps it's |
| 10 |
> prudent to not update to a "beta"... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Best regards |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Peter K |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
If it wasn't beta, I'd update anyway. At least then I would know what |
| 20 |
it is not, well most likely anyway. It's the beta that bothers me. |
| 21 |
I'll try to remember to check back in a month or so to see if it is out |
| 22 |
of beta. Maybe it does have some sort of fix in it. I sure would like |
| 23 |
one. I had several days of uptime then it crashed. It has worked fine |
| 24 |
since too. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Dale |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
:-) :-) |
Archives