Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: David Haller <gentoo@×××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it?
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 11:27:07
Message-Id: 20171122085729.xj3rkajouubpvu6v@grusum.endjinn.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it? by "J. Roeleveld"
1 Hello,
2
3 On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, J. Roeleveld wrote:
4 >On Wednesday, November 22, 2017 8:48:08 AM CET David Haller wrote:
5 >> So, your emerge is mostly IO and "emerge"-threads bound. Solution:
6 >> adjust your build-threads[1], and then adjust your emerge jobs! See
7 >> '--jobs' in 'man emerge'. Can't find where to set a default in a
8 >> config-file for that ATM, but you could always alias/function/script
9 >> emerge to something else, e.g. put this in your ~/.bashrc:
10 >
11 >Instead of all these aliases, simply edit your make.conf ( /etc/portage/
12 >make.conf )
13 >
14 >And edit (or add) the following lines:
15 >MAKEOPTS="--jobs 24 --load-average 48"
16 >EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--jobs 24 --load-average 48"
17
18 Well, that alias/function/script is mostly for all the other (default)
19 options I want ;) Hm. What's this EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS though? ;)) And
20 how can I override them if not wanted? .oO( gotta read up on that )Oo.
21
22 -dnh
23
24 --
25 85: Hot plugable
26 Glüht beim Einstecken auf (Martin Neumann)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it? Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>