| 1 |
Peter Ruskin wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 10 January 2010 23:45:13 Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Stroller wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On 10 Jan 2010, at 19:05, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>>>> ... |
| 9 |
>>>>> Most reasonable people |
| 10 |
>>>>> agree that KDE should have supported KDE 3 for at least a few |
| 11 |
>>>>> more months. |
| 12 |
>>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> Do you have a citation for that? Preferably one that doesn't |
| 14 |
>>>> define reasonable people as those that think KDE 3.5 should |
| 15 |
>>>> still be developed :) |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>> reasonable people = those who agree with me. |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>> Not really, those who said that BEFORE I started having problems |
| 20 |
>> at all. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> Dale |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
> Dale, I felt the same as you when they dropped KDE1 for 2, then |
| 26 |
> again when they dropped KDE2 for 3 and now that they've dropped |
| 27 |
> KDE3. We get used to a way of working and don't like the change. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Having loved KDE1 I've got used to KDE3, even though some things |
| 30 |
> don't work as well as in KDE1 - a lot of things have been included |
| 31 |
> that weren't there before (K3B for instance). |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> I've learnt to be irritated by this but accept it as inevitable. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Again, I am being misunderstood. This is not because I don't like KDE |
| 37 |
4. Even when it first came out and was buggy as heck, I thought it was |
| 38 |
cool. Heck, I'm looking forward to using KDE 4, whenever it works and |
| 39 |
does what I need a GUI to do. It's not change that bugs me at all. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Just to clarify here, I'm not against KDE 4 at all. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Dale |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
:-) :-) |
Archives