| 1 |
you might check out webrsync fwiw |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 11/26/14 23:43, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@×××××.at> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Sometimes I wonder why syncing portage isn't yet available via git ;-) |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> Well, right now it is because it is too much of a pain to try to keep |
| 8 |
> cvs and git in sync. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> However, the plan for the future is to have a master repo (where the |
| 11 |
> pushes go to), a git sync repo, and an rsync repo. The middle option |
| 12 |
> is likely going to interest you. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> -- |
| 15 |
> Rich |
| 16 |
> |
Archives