| 1 |
On 2021.10.27 09:59, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday, 27 October 2021 14:44:09 BST Pascal Schorde wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > did you have dev-ruby/rubygems installed? See |
| 5 |
> > https://jekyllrb.com/docs/#prerequisites |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Yes, but at version 3.0: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> $ eix dev-ruby/rubygems |
| 10 |
> [I] dev-ruby/rubygems |
| 11 |
> Available versions: 3.0.3^t 3.0.9^t 3.1.6^t (~)3.2.14^t{tbz2} |
| 12 |
> [M] |
| 13 |
> (~)3.2.22^t{tbz2} {server test RUBY_TARGETS="ruby26 ruby27 ruby30"} |
| 14 |
> Installed versions: 3.2.14^t{tbz2}(09:19:26 10/26/21)(-server |
| 15 |
> -test |
| 16 |
> RUBY_TARGETS="ruby26 ruby30 -ruby27") |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> One possibility occurred to me: is having two ruby versions installed |
| 19 |
> at once |
| 20 |
> the problem? I already had 3.0 installed, the current Gentoo version, |
| 21 |
> but |
| 22 |
> jekyll needs 2.6. To test this idea, I'd have to downgrade the whole |
| 23 |
> system to |
| 24 |
> 2.6; I don't know whether that's even feasible now. |
| 25 |
Ruby is slotted, so you can have 2.6 and 3.0 installed together. You |
| 26 |
would then need to rebuild rubygems to target both of them. There is |
| 27 |
also a virtual/rubygems. I'm not really sure of it's function, but it |
| 28 |
seems to just specify a minimum version of rubygems per targetted |
| 29 |
version of ruby. |
Archives