1 |
On 2015-01-24 05:20, Meino.Cramer@×××.de wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> for my embedded systems I use gentoo. Their "harddisk"s are simple |
5 |
> microSDcards. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> When updateing or emerging especially the "Calculation |
8 |
> dependencies..." is a step which needs a lot of patience of the |
9 |
> user (me ;). |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Is there any way to make it faster or (in other words): Are there |
12 |
> different ways to "Calculating dependencies..." and have only chossen |
13 |
> the slowest one...? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> What can I do to spped it up? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Best regards, |
18 |
> Meino |
19 |
> |
20 |
> PS: This is ***NO*** complain against Gentoo, the emerge-process or |
21 |
> any other implizit or explizit critism!!! |
22 |
> I *love* Gentoo -- thats why I am using it even for my embedded |
23 |
> systems. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> PPS: Yes, I know of crosscompiling and other way to do the hard work |
26 |
> on another machine. I screwed up my systems more than once in the past |
27 |
> with my attempts to get that working. I want to natively compile on |
28 |
> the embedded systems therefore. |
29 |
|
30 |
Recent change to make portage a bit faster (or to fail faster): |
31 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536926 |
32 |
|
33 |
Binary packages: |
34 |
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/94176 |
35 |
|
36 |
As far as I know, there is no magical tuning that would speed up portage |
37 |
(it would be enabled by default I believe ;)). |