From: | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: hardened: setuid | ||
Date: | Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:02:26 | ||
Message-Id: | 358eca8f0607130354u3a0d7713s30d5fe7348786921@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: hardened: setuid by James |
1 | On 12/07/06, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > I have not seen any indication of comprimise. |
4 | > Yes the system had redhat some years ago. It's entirely possible the same |
5 | > partition table was used and therefore these residual files are artifacts |
6 | > of a previous installation. My googling did not find any thing. |
7 | > |
8 | > Where did you find out they are redhat files? |
9 | |
10 | Have a look here: |
11 | |
12 | http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/Red_Hat_Contrib-Net__rhcn-bugs_redhat.com_.html |
13 | http://web.mit.edu/ist/topics/linux/linux-athena.html |
14 | http://web.mit.edu/ist/topics/athena/differences.html |
15 | |
16 | I have found that re-using partitions without zeroing them first, |
17 | using e.g. dd, or without making a new fs over them ends up in old |
18 | files being suddenly resurrected . . . |
19 | -- |
20 | Regards, |
21 | Mick |
22 | -- |
23 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |