Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What's happened to gentoo-sources?
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:53:06
Message-Id: 20160822135221.GE2571@acm.fritz.box
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] What's happened to gentoo-sources? by Peter Humphrey
1 Hello, Peter.
2
3 On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 02:23:25PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
4 > On Monday 22 Aug 2016 11:19:07 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
5 > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:12:59AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
6 > > > After this morning's sync, both versions 4.4.6 and 4.6.4 of
7 > > > gentoo-sources have disappeared. Is this just finger trouble in the
8 > > > server chain? I get the same with UK and US sync servers.
9
10 > > I restrict myself (mostly) to stable releases, and there hasn't been one
11 > > for gentoo-sources for a very long time.
12
13 > Indeed, I've found the same on my stable systems.
14
15 > > The latest stable kernel I see (with $ eshowkw gentoo-sources) is 4.1.15-
16 > > r1, although 4.4.6 was stable and available at one stage :-(.
17
18 > My x86 box is still running 4.4.6 because I don't want to plunge all the way
19 > back to 4.1.45-r1. This box needs to be ~amd64 to get the latest NVMe and
20 > amdgpu drivers.
21
22 I never did get around to configuring and building 4.4.6. Maybe I
23 should. But my box is now pushing 7 years old and seems built like a
24 tank (albeit one that needed a new power supply after just over a year).
25
26 I'm hoping that when the time comes, I'll still be able to buy a
27 motherboard that will allow Gentoo to be installed on it. I can't see
28 myself doing that any time soon. The only real reason to get a more
29 powerful machine would be to be able to build libreoffice in a sensible
30 amount of time. If that were a priority, I could just upgrade to 16 GB
31 RAM and build LO in a ramdisk.
32
33 > --
34 > Rgds
35 > Peter
36
37 --
38 Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).