| 1 |
Am Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:44:29 +0200 |
| 2 |
schrieb "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thursday, August 27, 2015 07:13:58 PM Marc Joliet wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:42:07 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > schrieb "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>: |
| 8 |
> > > I only had 1 required by set. |
| 9 |
> > > Which basically got me to remove the llvm use-flag from mesa. |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > That solved the block for me as it ended up removing "llvm" |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > [...] |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > FWIW, my experience yesterday was that you should be able to set the llvm |
| 16 |
> > flag again and continue to not have the blocker (although AIUI that flag is |
| 17 |
> > only really useful for the free drivers). |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> In other words, the OSS versions for NVidia and ATI and the Intel? |
| 20 |
> I use the proprietary Nvidia and the Intel driver. |
| 21 |
[...] |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I would argue that since mesa is a free software implementation of OpenGL, it |
| 24 |
should be completely irrelevant to the proprietary drivers. Therefor, I would |
| 25 |
think that this USE flag should not matter to you. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
(However, I am not 100% sure that software can't use mesa in different ways, |
| 28 |
since a lot of ebuilds have a direct dependency on mesa, e.g., cairo, libsdl2.) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Marc Joliet |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
| 34 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |
Archives